Since almost everyone in The Netherlands rides their bike at some time, they understand what it feels like to be in the bike lane, and are therefore more respectful to the bicycles on the road. They know that it can be stressful to be passed closely, and they know that riding a bike is much easier when you’re preserving your momentum. Here are a few cultural results of that respect.
This is Part 2 in a 3 part series on Amsterdam. Check out my initial observations 4 Insights about Biking in Amsterdam and The Netherland and more info on Bicycle Infrastructure in Amsterdam and The Netherlands.
Cars Don’t Pass Too Closely
Of all the bicycle riding I did around Holland, most of it was on a specific bike lane where I didn’t mix with cars. However, sometimes I would end up on a street that was a bit too narrow for the cars to pass me comfortably. You know what would happen? Nothing. The car would slowly roll a safe distance behind me until there was adequate room or I turned. Usually I pulled over in a nook to let them pass anyway, but I was stunned at the amount of respect everyone had on the streets.
This can serve as a reminder to car drivers everywhere: In crowded urban areas with small blocks and traffic, passing a cyclist usually results in the cyclist passing you about 10 seconds later when you stop. So unless you’re sure you’re not going to be passed again, why not just drive slow for those 10 seconds. It can feel like an eternity, but you can do it! Pump the brakes and drive slow.
Although this may be largely culture, I think education can be key here. I glanced at the California DMV handbook, and out of 117 pages there were only a few devoted to bicycles, most being quite general. I wonder how many pages are devoted to bikes in the Netherlands DMV…(if you can find this out let me know!)
People Allow Bicycles to Preserve Their Momentum
For anyone who rides a bike, this is obvious. But it can be missed by people who believe that bicycles should obey all the same traffic laws in EXACTLY the same way as automobiles. Since most people in The Netherlands ride their bikes, they seem to be on the same page.
For example, if I’m coming down a path and nearing a pedestrian walkway with no one in it, it’s customary for the pedestrians to wait a few moments for me to pass with my momentum intact instead of walking out in front of me. It’s similar to a situation when there’s one car on a street with a crosswalk. You might as well wait for that one car to go through instead of making it slow down while you awkwardly walk across slightly faster than normal. I’d rather walk across the street with no one waiting on me.
The same thing goes with cars. The drivers of cars know that they’re guests in busy urban areas, and they act accordingly. They give me the space I need and will wait for me to pass through an intersection if I’m just one bicycle.
Last but not least, other bicyclists are also helping each other conserve momentum. Many intersections have just a yield or no specific rules, so people are making eye contact and yielding according to what makes the most sense around them. Every situation is different, and of course there’s always a chance you’ll get caught in the “You go,” “No you go”, “Okay I’ll go,” dance, but in general it makes life as a commuter much more fluid.
This does bring up one important point: Electric Assist Bicycles. I didn’t see many on the road, but I heard some Dutch people talking about them. The issue is that on these crowded streets, it’s harder to make assumptions about people’s speeds when the e-bikes can accelerate faster than normal! I heard of a few accidents from this, and I think the Dutch are being strict about the e-bikes, but their adoption is already happening. Most of the e-bike use so far seems to be intercity travel. People from outside of Amsterdam can ride on one of Holland’s “bike highways” to get into the city potentially as fast as a train.
Pedestrians Are More Aware
Since I’ve just mentioned that pedestrians are sometimes waiting on bicycles, it means that life as a pedestrian does require more awareness. While walking around Amsterdam, I had to really watch where I was walking. Bikes are quiet and fast. I can’t rely on sounds and bright headlights from cars. The bike lanes can be close to the sidewalk, and I have to make sure I don’t stray into the bike lane by accident.
It’s also noticeable when crossing the street. There isn’t just one street to cross, there’s 2 bike lanes, a street, and potentially other things like a tram crossing! I have to be very weary across these bike paths, since it’s not obvious if a bike is coming, especially in the darkness when only some people having bike lights.
With that being said, by no means do I feel unsafe as a pedestrian, and I think this is a worthy trade-off for much safer streets in general.
Thanks for reading my Part 2 musings about biking in Amsterdam. Check out Part 1 for my initial insights on biking in Amsterdam, and Part 3 on Part 3 Bicycle Infrastructure in Amsterdam and The Netherlands!
10 thoughts on “The Respect for Bicycles in Amsterdam Culture”
I took you up on that challenge of finding the pages devoted to cyclists in the Dutch DMV handbook. Now, first things first, I couldn’t really find the equivalent handbook for the Netherlands. What I did find were the Traffic Signs and Traffic Rules in the Netherlands (most recent version from 2013, by the Ministry for Transport https://staticresources.rijkswaterstaat.nl/binaries/Boekje%20Verkeersborden%20en%20verkeersregels%20in%20Nederland_tcm174-337518_tcm21-9388.pdf) and the Strategic Plan for Traffic Safety 2008-2020 (92 pages also by the Ministry for Transport, https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/beleidsnota-s/2009/06/15/strategisch-plan-verkeersveiligheid-2008-2020/strategischplan-n.pdf).
From that first one, which has 86 articles, I will explain those that explicitly mention bikes, so these are specific laws for bikes.
– Article 3 allows cyclists to ride two abreast.
– Article 5 deals with the rules on bikes, like you have to use the compulsory bike lane if there is one (designated by the famous round blue bike sign). They may use the non-compulsory bike lane (designated by the rectangular blue sign saying “fietspad”)
– Article 11 designates that taking over other traffic must occur on the left only, with point 3 specifying that cyclists should follow this when taking over fellow cyclists, but may pass other traffic on the right.
– Article 23 highlights that no driver may stop on a bike lane.
– Article 27 specifies that bikes must be parked on the sidewalk, the grassy parts next to roads, or in designated spots.
– Article 35 is solely about the lights that every bike must have. In 9 points it is detailed what the color, placement, number and brightness of these lights must be (e.g. only yellow or white lights in front, only red in the back, lights on each wheel if the bike has more than two wheels, they may not blink, etc.)
– Article 58 allows cyclists to transport one person older than 8 years on the back bike rack. Under that age, they must be seated in a protected seat with back, hand, and leg support.
– Article 65 states that bike parking may occur when the usual sign (blue circle with red circumference and band) bans other traffic from doing so.
– Article 68 states that bikes should follow the specific bike traffic lights when available and may turn right on red when so indicated (“rechtsaf voor fietsers vrij”)
In conclusion, out of 86 articles, 9 mention bikes specifically. This obviously doesn’t include any articles that are deemed to hold for “bestuurders”, which is any road user except the pedestrian and would therefore logically include the cyclist.
Alright, moving on to the Strategic Plan, written by the Ministry for Transport. There are 25 mentions of bikes/cyclists in the first 46 pages when we reach the specific section on bikes. After that, I count 41 more mentions.To give an idea what is talked about:
– Bikes are a main point of concern for improving road safety.
– The importance of a stable bike is especially relevant for older cyclists.
– Direct translation of a telling paragraph: “Despite the car’s dominant role in current traffic, not the car but the human being is the measure of traffic safety policy. When walking or biking, a person does not benefit from the same physical protection as in a car. Because the car has high mass and speed on top of that, the consequences of a collision are severe. That’s why the protection of vulnerable groups is mainly formed via measures for the car and its driver. Drivers ought to be aware of the vulnerability of other road users and heed them in their behavior. Measures for vehicles and their drivers therefore directly concern pedestrians and cyclists.”
– Of the nine negative developments mentioned, the first two are about the increase in fatalities among cyclists and the rise in unilateral bike accidents.
– They devote some space to discussing the lower bike usage among immigrants.
– A few interesting lines about foreign road users: “The demands for driver’s licenses are now equalized within the EU, but education and testing are not in all countries as thorough as in the Netherlands. Particularly the relative unfamiliarity of some drivers with the cyclist’s prominent role in Dutch traffic can have negative consequences.”
– The section on bikes mainly discusses accidents, with 47% of all road use fatalities and injuries (as treated in hospitals), but the vast majority of those is unilateral. This raises the call for more maintenance of paths.
– Final direct quote: “Safety for cyclists is viewed from the angles of vehicles (collision compatibility), behavior (training, recognizing danger, bike school), and infrastructure (separated bike lanes and maintenance).” Considering collision compatibility, they suggest bike detection tools for vehicles.
Ok, phew, that’s done! So I can’t give you a nice exact page count, but it’s pretty clear that bikes in the Netherlands get a good amount of attention in both law and policy.
Shoot, I just discovered there’s also an English version of the Dutch traffic laws, so I needn’t have translated it all: media.leidenuniv.nl/legacy/road-traffic-signs-and-regulations-jan-2013-uk.pdf.
Hi Chantal!
Is there an english version of the dociment https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/beleidsnota-s/2009/06/15/strategisch-plan-verkeersveiligheid-2008-2020/strategischplan-n.pdf
Thank you!
Marco
One quick google search, and I also found that one: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/20151210_1_netherland.pdf
Now you can verify my translation skills 🙂